It is what economists refer to as a high-bulk, low-value product.
It is what economists refer to as a high-bulk, low-value product.Tags: Kids Should Have No HomeworkBrave New World Criticism EssaysBusiness Plan For Software DevelopmentProblem Solving In DecimalsHow Is A Newspaper Editorial Like A Persuasive EssayCollege Essays Prompts
Further, any shipping requires the infrastructure of waterfront docks, warehouses dedicated to stockpiling grain, and improvements in shipping routes.
Since the vast majority of British North American grain originated in Upper Canada, the priority was building canals in order to load up barges on Lake Ontario or even Lake Erie and send them downriver to Montreal or, better still, put the grain onto ships that could head straight out into the Atlantic.
Things were made more complex by the Corn Laws, which were protective tariffs put in place as part of the mercantilist system that channelled colonial products to imperial ports and limited colonial imports from non-imperial sources.
The Corn Laws were introduced in 1815 and, for five years, British North American grain enjoyed the same privileged status on the British market as homegrown grain.
In other words, grain ships are grain ships, not container ships that can carry a multitude of different products.
Nor are they smaller, faster vessels designed to transport textile products.
The staple theory, already discussed in terms of how it applied to resources like fish and furs, can be used to understand the wheat economy as well.
The lack of diversification in the Upper Canadian farming economy is a symptom of the limits of a staple-dominated system.
Against this setting, the market for British North American grain had taken a tumble after the end of the war, especially in 1820, and prices fell badly.
Up to about 1816 the rapid growth in the British population discussed earlier needed feeding and had been the source of wealth for anyone who could produce a surplus of wheat.