For example, The Arab spring came out of a process of globalisation as a result of time and space compression allowing members of the public to experience events in real time, it was also encouraged by the increased use of social media.
However, America could not determine the outcome of this event and it did not work in their favour.
Globalisation is an umbrella term for a complex series of economic, social, technological and political changes seen as increasing interdependence and interaction between people and companies in disparate locations since the 1980s.
This has replaced the “billiard-ball model” with a “cobweb model” as states become increasingly interdependent.
Another example is ISIS, their slick media campaigns and ability to encourage people across the world to join them in fighting, shows that they are another product of globalisation that do not align with America.
In conclusion, it can be argued that globalisation has been used as a tool by America to increase their influence and power in the society today.
Globalisation cannot be simply seen as Americanisation in disguise as it benefits all the countries that participate in it.
Since the 1990s, globalisation has benefited emerging powers such as China, which by 2025 is projected to overtake the USA in economic terms, as they are neck on neck in the share of world GDP (China has a 1% larger share than America in total world GDP), and China overtaking America in trade and foreign investment.
However, hyper globalists argue this has benefited multiple countries and has positively created a borderless world, supported by liberals who suggest this has improved international relations.
The USA has the worlds’ largest economy and they still remain a global hegemon even though their share of the global economy has fallen.